WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/11043
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKolovos, A.-
dc.contributor.authorQassim, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHassall, M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, H. N.-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, J.-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, T. T.-
dc.contributor.authorHe, W.-
dc.contributor.authorMullany, S.-
dc.contributor.authorHollitt, G. L.-
dc.contributor.authorBerry, E. C.-
dc.contributor.authorTang, V.-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, T.-
dc.contributor.authorLake, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMills, R.-
dc.contributor.authorLanders, J.-
dc.contributor.authorCasson, R. J.-
dc.contributor.authorGalanopoulos, A.-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, S. L.-
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHealey, Paul R.-
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, I.-
dc.contributor.authorGrigg, J.-
dc.contributor.authorRuddle, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMackey, D. A.-
dc.contributor.authorBurdon, K. P.-
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, A. W.-
dc.contributor.authorSeviiri, M.-
dc.contributor.authorGharahkhani, P.-
dc.contributor.authorSouzeau, E.-
dc.contributor.authorSiggs, O. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMacGregor, S.-
dc.contributor.authorCraig, J. E.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-02T02:16:07Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-02T02:16:07Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationOphthalmology. 00,-
dc.identifier.urihttps://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/11043-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) is a known risk factor for glaucoma, but its individual clinical course ranges from no glaucoma to total blindness. This study investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRSs) built from variants collectively associated with open-angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure (IOP), and vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) can stratify individuals with pseudoexfoliation for the risk of glaucoma development. DESIGN: Retrospective multicohort study of 2 glaucoma registries and 1 population-based cohort. PARTICIPANTS: For the primary analysis, participants (n = 828) were classified as having PEX with glaucoma, PEX with suspected glaucoma, or PEX with no glaucoma. For the secondary analysis, a cohort of participants (n = 2460) were classified as having PEX with glaucoma, having PEX with no glaucoma, and being unaffected, and an independent cohort of participants (n = 3372) were classified as having primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or suspected POAG. METHODS: Previously published and validated PRSs for open-angle glaucoma, IOP, and VCDR were expressed as a percentile, decile, or tertile of an ancestrally matched healthy population. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions and survival analyses were performed. <ovid:br/>Main Outcome Measure(s): The main outcome measures were odds of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEX-G) and odds of clinically relevant outcomes. RESULTS: Participants in the top tertile of the glaucoma PRS showed greater odds of receiving a PEX-G diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.62-6.88; P < 0.001), greater odds of bilateral central vision loss (aOR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.49-8.99; P = 0.007), and greater odds of bilateral incisional surgery (aOR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.33-10.24; P = 0.018). Age at PEX-G diagnosis was 1 year younger with each increasing glaucoma PRS decile (1.06 years; 95% CI, 0.59-1.53 years; P < 0.001). Participants with manifest glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation showed a comparatively lower glaucoma PRS than counterparts with POAG. CONCLUSIONS: The PRSs for open-angle glaucoma, IOP, and VCDR stratify risk of glaucoma development and disease severity among individuals with PEX. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.-
dc.subjectOphthalmology-
dc.titleA multitrait open-angle glaucoma polygenic risk score stratifies risk of glaucoma diagnosis and severity in eyes with pseudoexfoliation-
dc.typeAhead-of-Print-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.02.013-
dc.subject.keywordsblindness-
dc.subject.keywordscentral scotoma-
dc.subject.keywordsetiology-
dc.subject.keywordsglaucoma-
dc.subject.keywordsintraocular pressure-
dc.subject.keywordsopen angle glaucoma-
dc.subject.keywordspseudoexfoliation-
dc.subject.keywordsscotoma-
dc.subject.keywordsspecial situation for pharmacovigilance-
dc.subject.keywordssurgery-
dc.subject.keywordsvertical cup-to-disc ratio-
dc.identifier.journaltitleOphthalmology-
dc.identifier.departmentOphthalmology-
dc.contributor.wslhdHealey, Paul R.-
dc.contributor.wslhdMitchell, Paul-
dc.type.studyortrialCohort Analysis-
dc.type.studyortrialControlled Study-
dc.type.studyortrialMajor Clinical Study-
dc.type.studyortrialRetrospective Study-
dc.identifier.pmid40010646-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationQueensland Institute of Medical Research Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationOphthalmic Research Laboratories, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, Adelaide, SA, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine and Health, Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Lions Eye Institute, Perth, WA, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.facilityWestmead-
Appears in Collections:WSLHD publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.