WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/6917
TitleOutcomes of live renal donors with a history of nephrolithiasis: A systematic review
Authors: Bin Mohamed Ebrahim, Mohamed E.;Singla, Animesh;Yao, Jinna;Laurence, Jerome M.;Wong, Germaine;Lau, Howard M. H.;Lee, Taina;Yuen, Lawrence P.;Lim, W. H.;Pleass, Henry C.
WSLHD Author: Bin Mohamed Ebrahim, Mohamed E.;Singla, Animesh;Yao, Jinna;Laurence, Jerome M.;Wong, Germaine;Lau, Howard M. H.;Lee, Taina;Yuen, Lawrence P.;Pleass, Henry C.
Subjects: Transplantation
Issue Date: 2023
Citation: Transplantation Reviews. 37(1):100746, 2023 Jan
Abstract: The clinical outcomes of kidney donors with a prior history of nephrolithiasis are poorly defined. We conducted a systematic review assessing the post-donation clinical outcomes of kidney donors with a history of nephrolithiasis. Electronic databases (Ovid and Embase) were searched between 1960 and 2021 using key terms and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) - nephrolithiasis, renal stones, renal transplantation and renal graft. Articles included conference proceedings and journal articles and were not excluded based on patient numbers. Primary outcome was donor stone-related event. Secondary outcomes were renal function upon follow-up or post-operative nephrectomy complications. In summary, 340 articles were identified through database search. We identified 14 studies (16 cohorts) comprising 432 live donors followed up for a median of 26 months post live kidney donation. Six donors donated the stone-free kidney whilst 23 live donors had bilateral stones. Mean stone size was 4.2 +/- 1.4 mm (1-16) with average follow up duration of 21.1 months (1-149). Twelve studies provided primary outcome (n = 138 patients) and eight (n = 348) for secondary outcomes. One donor had a stone-related event upon follow up. A total of 195 patients had eGFR <60 upon follow up. However, they were not significantly different when compared to renal function of live donors that didn't have pre-donation nephrolithiasis. Many of the studies couldn't provide long term follow up, coupled with limited data regarding the nature of the pre-donation stone disease. In conclusion, this systematic review shows that we have very limited information upon which to base recommendation regarding pre-donation risk of post-donation complications. Longer term follow up is required and lifelong follow up with live donor registries will aid further understanding.
URI: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/6917
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2022.100746
Journal: Transplantation Reviews
Type: Review
Study or Trial: Data Analysis
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Department: Surgery
Nephrology
Urology
Facility: Auburn
Blacktown
Westmead
Affiliated Organisations: Department of Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Specialty of Surgery, FMH, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, Australia
National Pancreas Transplant Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
Renal Transplant Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
Keywords: Humans
Living Donors
Kidney
Nephrolithiasis
Kidney Transplantation
Nephrectomy
Appears in Collections:WSLHD publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing