WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/7011
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKruit, Natalie-
dc.contributor.authorRattan, N.-
dc.contributor.authorTian, David-
dc.contributor.authorDieleman, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorBurrell, A.-
dc.contributor.authorDennis, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T06:13:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-05T06:13:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Anesthesia 37(5):748-754, 2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/7011-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the available published evidence of the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the prehospital setting on clinical outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews an Meta-Analyses guidelines. SETTING: In the prehospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: All randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational trials using pre-hospital ECPR in adult patients (>17 years). INTERVENTIONS: Prehospital ECPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study authors searched Medline, Embase, and PUBMED for all RCTs and observational trials. The studies were assessed for clinical, methodologic, and statistical heterogeneity. The primary outcome was survival at hospital discharge. The study outcomes were aggregated using random-effects meta-analysis of means or proportions as appropriate. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence. Four studies were included, with a total of 222 patients receiving prehospital ECPR (mean age = 51 years [95% CI 44-57], 81% of patients were male (CI 74-87), and 60% patients had a cardiac cause for their arrest (95% CI 43-76). Overall survival at discharge was 23.4% (95% CI 15.5-33.7; I2 = 62%). The pooled low-flow time was 61.1 minutes (95% CI 45.2-77.0; I2 = 97%). The quality of evidence was assessed to be low, and the overall risk of bias was assessed to be serious, with confounding being the primary source of bias.-
dc.titlePrehospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.12.004-
dc.subject.keywordsOut-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-
dc.subject.keywordsCardiopulmonary Resuscitation-
dc.subject.keywordsPatient Discharge-
dc.subject.keywordsEmergency Medical Services-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Anesthesia-
dc.identifier.departmentAnaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine-
dc.identifier.pmid36641307-
dc.contributor.wslhdKruit, Natalie-
dc.contributor.wslhdTian, David H.-
dc.contributor.wslhdDieleman, Stefan-
dc.identifier.facilityWestmead-
Appears in Collections:Westmead Hospital 2019 - 2024

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.