WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/8196
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShah, K. K.-
dc.contributor.authorWyld, Melanie L. R.-
dc.contributor.authorHedley, J. A.-
dc.contributor.authorWaller, K. M. J.-
dc.contributor.authorDe La Mata, N.-
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Angela C.-
dc.contributor.authorMorton, R. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T14:00:10Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-28T14:00:10Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationTransplantation 107(9):2028-2042, 2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/8196-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Demand for donor kidneys outstrips supply. Using kidneys from selected donors with an increased risk of blood-borne virus (BBV) transmission (hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus [HCV], human immunodeficiency virus) may expand the donor pool, but cost-effectiveness of this strategy is uncertain. METHODS: A Markov model was developed using real-world evidence to compare healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of accepting kidneys from deceased donors with potential increased risk of BBV transmission, because of increased risk behaviors and/or history of HCV, versus declining these kidneys. Model simulations were run over a 20-y time horizon. Parameter uncertainty was assessed through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Accepting kidneys from donors at increased risk of BBVs (2% from donors with increased-risk behaviors and 5% from donors with active or past HCV infection) incurred total costs of 311 303 Australian dollars with a gain of 8.53 QALYs. Foregoing kidneys from these donors incurred total costs of $330 517 and a gain of 8.44 QALYs. A cost-saving of $19 214 and additional 0.09 QALYs (~33 d in full health) per person would be generated compared with declining these donors. Increasing the availability of kidneys with increased risk by 15% led to further cost-savings of $57 425 and additional 0.23 QALY gains (~84 d in full health). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10 000 iterations showed accepting kidneys from donors at increased risk led to lower costs and higher QALY gains. CONCLUSIONS: Shifting clinical practice to accept increased BBV risk donors would likely produce lower costs and higher QALYs for health systems.-
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of Kidney Transplantation From Donors at Increased Risk of Blood-borne Virus Infection Transmission-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000004632-
dc.subject.keywordsKidney Transplantation-
dc.subject.keywordsCost-Benefit Analysis-
dc.subject.keywordsAustralia-
dc.subject.keywordsHepatitis C-
dc.subject.keywordsTissue Donors-
dc.subject.keywordsHepacivirus-
dc.identifier.journaltitleTransplantation-
dc.contributor.wslhdWyld, Melanie L. R.-
dc.contributor.wslhdWebster, Angela C.-
dc.identifier.pmid37211651-
dc.identifier.facilityWestmead-
Appears in Collections:Westmead Hospital 2019 - 2024

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.