WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9396
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGjorup, C. A.-
dc.contributor.authorWoodford, R.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, I.-
dc.contributor.authorCarlino, Matteo S.-
dc.contributor.authorCh'ng, S.-
dc.contributor.authorChung, D.-
dc.contributor.authorHsiao, E.-
dc.contributor.authorLo, S. N.-
dc.contributor.authorLondon, K.-
dc.contributor.authorLong, G. V.-
dc.contributor.authorMenzies, A. M.-
dc.contributor.authorNieweg, O. E.-
dc.contributor.authorPennington, T. E.-
dc.contributor.authorRtshiladze, M. A.-
dc.contributor.authorSaw, R. P. M.-
dc.contributor.authorScolyer, R. A.-
dc.contributor.authorShannon, K. F.-
dc.contributor.authorSpillane, A. J.-
dc.contributor.authorStretch, J. R.-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, J. F.-
dc.contributor.authorVarey, Alexander H. R.-
dc.contributor.authorvan Akkooi, A. C. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T04:48:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-19T04:48:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgical Oncology 31(3):1857-1864, 2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9396-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: In sentinel node-positive (SN+ve) melanoma patients, active surveillance with regular ultrasound examination of the node field has become standard, rather than completion lymph node dissection (CLND). A proportion of these patients now receive adjuvant systemic therapy and have routine cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT] or positron emission tomography [PET]/CT). The role of concurrent ultrasound (US) surveillance in these patients is unclear. The purpose of our study was to describe the modality of detection of nodal recurrence in SN+ve node fields.METHODS: SN+ve melanoma patients who did not undergo CLND treated at a single institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were included.RESULTS: A total of 225 SN+ve patients with a median follow-up of 23 months were included. Of these, 119 (53%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Eighty (36%) developed a recurrence at any site; 24 (11%) recurred first in the SN+ve field, of which 12 (5%) were confirmed node field recurrence only at 2 months follow-up. The nodal recurrences were first detected by ultrasound in seven (3%), CT in seven (3%), and PET/CT in seven (3%) patients. All nodal recurrences evident on US were also evident on PET/CT and vice versa.CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of recurrences outside the node field and the identification of all US-detected nodal recurrences on concurrent cross-sectional imaging modalities suggest that routine concurrent ultrasound surveillance of the node-positive field may be unnecessary for SN+ve melanoma patients having routine cross-sectional imaging.-
dc.titleRole of Concurrent Ultrasound Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Node Fields in Melanoma Patients Having Routine Cross-Sectional Imaging-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14526-9-
dc.subject.keywordsMelanoma-
dc.subject.keywordsSkin Neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordsSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy-
dc.subject.keywordsPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography-
dc.subject.keywordsLymph Node Excision-
dc.subject.keywordsSentinel Lymph Node-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnnals of Surgical Oncology-
dc.identifier.departmentPlastic Surgery-
dc.identifier.departmentMedical Oncology-
dc.contributor.wslhdCarlino, Matteo S.-
dc.contributor.wslhdVarey, Alexander H. R.-
dc.identifier.pmid37966706-
dc.identifier.facilityWestmead-
Appears in Collections:Westmead Hospital 2019 - 2024

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.