WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/1985
TitleAssessment of Health Research Capacity in Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD): A Study on Medical, Nursing and Allied Health Professionals
Authors: Lee, Sharon A.;Byth, Karen;Gifford, J.;Balasubramanian, Madhan;Fozzard, Carolyn A.;Skapetis, Tony;Flood, Victoria M.
WSLHD Author: Lee, Sharon A.;Byth, Karen;Balasubramanian, Madhan;Fozzard, Carolyn A.;Skapetis, Tony;Flood, Victoria M.
Subjects: Allied Health
Issue Date: 2020
Citation: J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Feb 11;13:153-163
Abstract: Background: Research should inform clinical decision-making and evidence-based practice for all health professionals. To build research capacity among all health professionals, there is a need to measure the levels of research capacity and identify the gaps and needs of health-care professionals. The aim of the study was to better understand the research culture and capacity of health professionals (medical, nursing and allied health) in Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia. Methods A research capacity and culture tool (RCCT) survey was electronically distributed to all health staff in WSLHD. Data were collected between November 2016 and January 2017. Participants were surveyed through a 10-point Likert scale that measured research capacity at the individual, team and organisational levels. Results: A total of 393 health staff responded to the study: allied health practitioners (46.3%), nursing staff (35.4%) and medical practitioners (18.3%). Females made 76% of the sample, and 54% were aged between 35 and 54 years. Individual responses were different across professions, with an average median score for medical 6.3 (95% CI 5.8–6.9), allied health 5.3 (95% CI 4.9–5.7) and nursing 4.5 (95% CI 4.1–5.0) after adjustment for age and gender. Team responses for medical staff (average median score 5.9 95% CI 5.3–6.4) were higher than allied health (4.1 95% CI 3.7–4.6) and nursing (4.3 95% CI 3.8–4.8), after adjusting for age and gender. However, there were no differences between the three professions for the organisational responses. Allied health and nursing staff were less confident in obtaining research funding, submitting ethics applications, writing for publication and mentoring colleagues about research. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the individual research capacity for medical, allied health and nursing professionals are different. Research capacity building needs to be individually tailored to the specific needs of each profession. This research will inform future capacity building activities and training for health professionals in a large public health organisation of Sydney, Australia.
URI: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/1985
DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S222987
Type: Journal Article
Facility: Mental Health, Cumberland
Westmead
Keywords: Research capacity
Allied health
Nursing
Appears in Collections:Mental Health, Cumberland Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.