Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/4164
TitleHand-held fan-views of specialist respiratory clinicians
Authors: Roberts, Mary M.;Luckett, T.;Smith, Tracy A.;Garcia, M.;Dunn, S.;Swan, F.;Ferguson, Caleb;Kochovska, S.;Phillips, J.;Pearson, M.;Currow, D.;Johnson, M.
WSLHD Author: Roberts, Mary M.;Smith, Tracy A.;Ferguson, Caleb
Subjects: Respiratory Medicine;Allied Health
Issue Date: 2022
Citation: Respirology. 27(Supplement 1):20-87, 2022 Mar
Abstract: INTRODUCTION/AIM: The battery-operated hand-held fan ('fan') is an inexpensive and portable non-pharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness that has few if any harms and has been shown to reduce breathlessness intensity, improve physical activity and functioning, and reduce anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other conditions. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to the fan's implementation in specialist respiratory care as a nonpharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients with COPD. METHODS: A qualitative approach was taken, using focus groups. Participants were clinicians from any discipline working in specialist respiratory care at two hospitals. Questions asked about current fan-related practice and perceptions regarding benefits, harms and mechanisms, and factors influencing its implementation. Analysis used a mixed inductive/deductive approach. RESULTS: Forty-nine participants fromnursing (n=30),medical (n = 13) and allied health (n = 6) disciplines participated across nine focus groups. The most influential facilitator was a belief that the fan's benefits outweighed disadvantages. Clinicians' beliefs about the fan's mechanisms determined which patient sub-groups they targeted, for example anxious or palliative/endstage patients. Barriers to implementation included a lack of clarity about whose role it was to implement the fan, what advice to provide patients, and limited access to fans in hospitals. Few clinicians implemented the fan for acute-on-chronic breathlessness or in combination with other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the fan in specialist respiratory care may require service- and clinician-level interventions to ensure it is routinely recommended as a first-line intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients withCOPDof any stage.
URI: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/4164
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.14216
Journal: Respirology
Type: Conference Abstract
Study or Trial: Controlled Study
Multicentre Study
Department: Respiratory Medicine
Nursing and Midwifery
Facility: Blacktown
Westmead
Keywords: chronic obstructive lung disease
dyspnea
respiratory care
Conference name: TSANZSRS 2022, The Australia and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science and The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, ANZSRS/TSANZ Annual Scientific Meeting for Leaders in Lung Health and Respiratory Science. Virtual
Appears in Collections:WSLHD publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Roberts-2022-Hand-held fan-Views of specialist.pdf40.43 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing