Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/4164
Title: | Hand-held fan-views of specialist respiratory clinicians |
Authors: | Roberts, Mary M.;Luckett, T.;Smith, Tracy A.;Garcia, M.;Dunn, S.;Swan, F.;Ferguson, Caleb;Kochovska, S.;Phillips, J.;Pearson, M.;Currow, D.;Johnson, M. |
WSLHD Author: | Roberts, Mary M.;Smith, Tracy A.;Ferguson, Caleb |
Subjects: | Respiratory Medicine;Allied Health |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Citation: | Respirology. 27(Supplement 1):20-87, 2022 Mar |
Abstract: | INTRODUCTION/AIM: The battery-operated hand-held fan ('fan') is an inexpensive and portable non-pharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness that has few if any harms and has been shown to reduce breathlessness intensity, improve physical activity and functioning, and reduce anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other conditions. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to the fan's implementation in specialist respiratory care as a nonpharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients with COPD. METHODS: A qualitative approach was taken, using focus groups. Participants were clinicians from any discipline working in specialist respiratory care at two hospitals. Questions asked about current fan-related practice and perceptions regarding benefits, harms and mechanisms, and factors influencing its implementation. Analysis used a mixed inductive/deductive approach. RESULTS: Forty-nine participants fromnursing (n=30),medical (n = 13) and allied health (n = 6) disciplines participated across nine focus groups. The most influential facilitator was a belief that the fan's benefits outweighed disadvantages. Clinicians' beliefs about the fan's mechanisms determined which patient sub-groups they targeted, for example anxious or palliative/endstage patients. Barriers to implementation included a lack of clarity about whose role it was to implement the fan, what advice to provide patients, and limited access to fans in hospitals. Few clinicians implemented the fan for acute-on-chronic breathlessness or in combination with other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the fan in specialist respiratory care may require service- and clinician-level interventions to ensure it is routinely recommended as a first-line intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients withCOPDof any stage. |
URI: | https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/4164 |
DOI: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.14216 |
Journal: | Respirology |
Type: | Conference Abstract |
Study or Trial: | Controlled Study Multicentre Study |
Department: | Respiratory Medicine Nursing and Midwifery |
Facility: | Blacktown Westmead |
Keywords: | chronic obstructive lung disease dyspnea respiratory care |
Conference name: | TSANZSRS 2022, The Australia and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science and The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, ANZSRS/TSANZ Annual Scientific Meeting for Leaders in Lung Health and Respiratory Science. Virtual |
Appears in Collections: | WSLHD publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Roberts-2022-Hand-held fan-Views of specialist.pdf | 40.43 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.