Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/4167
Title: | N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) augmentation in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A phase III, 20-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial |
Authors: | Sarris, J.;Byrne, G.;Castle, D.;Bousman, C.;Oliver, G.;Cribb, L.;Blair-West, S.;Brakoulias, Vlasios;Camfield, D. A.;Ee, C.;Chamoli, S.;Boschen, M.;Dean, O. M.;Dowling, N.;Menon, R.;Murphy, J.;Metri, N.;Nguyen, T. P.;Wong, A.;Jordan, R.;Karamacoska, D.;Rossell, Susan L.;Berk, M.;Ng, C. H. |
WSLHD Author: | Brakoulias, Vlasios |
Subjects: | Mental Health |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Citation: | Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 117:110550, 2022 Jul |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: Preliminary evidence has suggested that adjunctive N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant precursor to glutathione, may reduce symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We conducted a 20-week, multi-site, randomized controlled trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of the adjunctive use of NAC in OCD. METHODS: The study was a phase III, 20-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial across multiple sites in Australia investigating 2 g to 4 g per day of NAC (titrated according to response) in 98 participants with DSM-5 diagnosed OCD. Data were analysed using linear mixed effects models for the 89 participants who attended at least one follow-up visit. Results A modified intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome found no evidence that NAC reduced symptoms of OCD measured on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, relative to placebo (mean difference at week 20 = 0.53, 95% compatibility interval = −2.18, 3.23; p = 0.70; favouring placebo). There was also no evidence that NAC, compared to placebo, improved outcomes on the secondary measures including anxiety, depression, quality of life, functioning, or clinician/participant impression. NAC was well-tolerated with only mild gastrointestinal adverse events associated with the treatment. Conclusion We found no evidence supporting the efficacy of the adjunctive use of NAC in OCD. |
URI: | https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/4167 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110550 |
Journal: | Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry |
Type: | Journal Article |
Study or Trial: | Randomized Controlled Trial |
Department: | Mental Health |
Facility: | Blacktown Mental Health, Cumberland |
Affiliated Organisations: | NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Kenneth Myer Building, Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Departments of Medical Genetics, Psychiatry, Physiology & Pharmacology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Professorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Western Sydney Local Health District Mental Health Service, Sydney, Australia; Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine, Western Sydney University Deakin University, IMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong |
Keywords: | Obsessive compulsive disorder Nutraceutical Anxiety Oxidative stress |
Appears in Collections: | Mental Health, Cumberland Hospital |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.