WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/8950
TitleHybrid resection versus conventional resection for laterally spreading lesions of the papilla
Authors: Gupta, Sunil;Craciun, Ana;Wang, Hunter;Whitfield, Anthony;Gauci, Julia;O'Sullivan, Timothy;Cronin, Oliver;Abuarisha, Muhammad;Klein, Amir;Lee, Eric Y. T.;Burgess, Nicholas G.;Bourke, Michael J.
WSLHD Author: Gupta, Sunil;Craciun, Ana;Wang, Hunter;Whitfield, Anthony;Gauci, Julia;O'Sullivan, Timothy;Cronin, Oliver;Abuarisha, Muhammad;Klein, Amir;Lee, Eric Y. T.;Burgess, Nicholas G.;Bourke, Michael J.
Issue Date: 2024
Citation: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 99(3):428-436, 2024
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although conventional hot snare resection (CR) of laterally spreading lesions of the major papilla (LSL-Ps) is effective, it can be associated with delayed bleeding in upward of 25% of cases. Given the excellent safety profile of cold snare polypectomy in the colorectum, we investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel hybrid resection (HR) technique for LSL-P management, consisting of hot snare papillectomy plus cold snare resection of the laterally spreading component.METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients underwent HR in a tertiary referral center over 60 months until December 2022. This cohort was compared with a historical cohort of patients who underwent CR at the same institution over 120 months until August 2017. The primary outcomes were recurrence and bleeding. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent HR (14 female; mean age 65.2 +/- 12.2 years). Median lesion size was 30 mm (interquartile range, 25.0-47.5 mm). Recurrent or residual adenoma (RRA) was greater with HR (58.8% [n = 10] vs 29.8% [n = 14]; P = .034). The odds ratio for recurrence was 3.6 times (95% CI, 1.2-11.0) higher with HR (P = .027). RRA was multifocal in 4 (40%) and had a composite RRA volume >10 mm in 7 (70%). The median number of procedures required to treat RRA was higher with HR (4 vs 1, P = .002). There was no difference between CR and HR for intraprocedural bleeding (41.1% [n = 23] vs 25% [n = 5]; P = .587) or delayed bleeding (25.0% vs 10.0%, P = .211). There were no perforations. CONCLUSIONS: The novel HR technique for LSL-P management is associated with a high rate of RRA that is recalcitrant to treatment, without mitigating the risk of intraprocedural or delayed bleeding. Therefore, CR should remain the mainstay management option for treating patients with an LSL-P. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02306603.). Copyright 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
URI: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/8950
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.034
Journal: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Type: Journal Article
Study or Trial: Clinical Trial
Department: Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Facility: Westmead
Keywords: Ampulla of Vater
Colonic Polyps
Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/ae [Adverse Effects]
Appears in Collections:Westmead Hospital 2019 - 2024

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.