WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9526
TitlePembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma: Outcomes in histopathologic subgroups from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial
Authors: Schadendorf, D.;Luke, J. J.;Ascierto, P. A.;Long, G. V.;Rutkowski, P.;Khattak, A.;Del Vecchio, Michele;de la Cruz-Merino, Luis;Mackiewicz, J.;Sileni, V. C.;Kirkwood, J. M.;Robert, C.;Grob, J.;Dummer, R.;Carlino, Matteo S.;Zhao, Y.;Kalabis, M.;Krepler, C.;Eggermont, A.;Scolyer, R. A.
WSLHD Author: Carlino, Matteo S.
Subjects: Oncology
Issue Date: 2024
Citation: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer 12(3):e007501, 2024
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) versus placebo in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study of resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma. At the prespecified third interim analysis (data cut-off, January 4, 2022), the HR for RFS in the overall population was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84) and the HR for DMFS was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). We present a post hoc analysis of efficacy by subtypes defined by histopathologic characteristics. METHODS: Patients aged >=12 years with newly diagnosed, resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo. The primary end point was RFS per investigator review; DMFS per investigator review was secondary. Subgroups of interest were melanoma subtype (nodular vs non-nodular), tumor thickness (<=4 mm vs >4 mm), presence of ulceration (yes vs no), mitotic rate (<5 per mm2 (median) vs >=5 per mm2), and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; absent vs present). RESULTS: Between September 23, 2018, and November 4, 2020, 976 patients were assigned to pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489). Median follow-up was 27.4 months (range, 14.0-39.4). The HR (95% CI) for RFS was 0.54 (0.37 to 0.79) for nodular and 0.77 (0.53 to 1.11) for non-nodular melanoma; 0.57 (0.37 to 0.89) for thickness <=4 mm and 0.69 (0.50 to 0.96) for >4 mm; 0.66 (0.50 to 0.89) for ulceration and 0.57 (0.32 to 1.03) for no ulceration; 0.57 (0.35 to 0.92) for mitotic rate <5 per mm2 and 0.57 (0.40 to 0.80) for >=5 per mm2; and 0.89 (0.52 to 1.54) for TILs absent and 0.51 (0.34 to 0.76) for TILs present. DMFS results were similar. In a Cox multivariate analysis, treatment arm, tumor thickness, and mitotic rate were significant independent factors for RFS, and treatment arm and mitotic rate were significant independent factors for DMFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, the benefit of pembrolizumab was largely consistent with the overall study population regardless of histopathologic characteristics. These results support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma.
URI: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9526
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-007501
Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Type: Journal Article
Study or Trial: Controlled Study
Major Clinical Study
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Randomized Controlled Trial
Department: Oncology
Facility: Blacktown
Westmead
Affiliated Organisations: University Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen AND University Alliance Ruhr, One Health Research Centre, NCT-West, Essen Campus, Essen, Germany
Cancer Immunotherapeutics Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori IRCCS "fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Faculty of Medicine AND Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Royal North Shore AND Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
Oncology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
Melanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
Aix Marseille University, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France
University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Blacktown Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Merck AND Co Inc, Rahway, NJ, United States
University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Keywords: Melanoma
Skin Neoplasms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Combined Modality Therapy
Adjuvants, Immunologic
Appears in Collections:Blacktown Mount Druitt Hospital

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.