Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9574
Title: | Measurement that matters: A systematic review and modified Delphi of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer quality indicators |
Authors: | Donnelly, C.;Or, M.;Toh, J.;Thevaraja, M.;Janssen, A.;Shaw, T.;Pathma-Nathan, N.;Harnett, P.;Chiew, K. L.;Vinod, S.;Sundaresan, P. |
WSLHD Author: | Or, Michelle;Toh, James;Pathma-Nathan, Nimalan;Harnett, Paul;Sundaresan, Puma |
Subjects: | Quality Indicators, Health Care;Australia;Consensus;Colorectal Neoplasms;Delphi Technique |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Citation: | Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 20(2):259-274, 2024 |
Abstract: | AIM: To develop a priority set of quality indicators (QIs) for use by colorectal cancer (CRC) multidisciplinary teams (MDTs). METHODS: The review search strategy was executed in four databases from 2009-August 2019. Two reviewers screened abstracts/manuscripts. Candidate QIs and characteristics were extracted using a tailored abstraction tool and assessed for scientific soundness. To prioritize candidate indicators, a modified Delphi consensus process was conducted. Consensus was sought over two rounds; (1) multidisciplinary expert workshops to identify relevance to Australian CRC MDTs, and (2) an online survey to prioritize QIs by clinical importance. RESULTS: A total of 93 unique QIs were extracted from 118 studies and categorized into domains of care within the CRC patient pathway. Approximately half the QIs involved more than one discipline (52.7%). One-third of QIs related to surgery of primary CRC (31.2%). QIs on supportive care (6%) and neoadjuvant therapy (6%) were limited. In the Delphi Round 1, workshop participants (n = 12) assessed 93 QIs and produced consensus on retaining 49 QIs including six new QIs. In Round 2, survey participants (n = 44) rated QIs and prioritized a final 26 QIs across all domains of care and disciplines with a concordance level > 80%. Participants represented all MDT disciplines, predominantly surgical (32%), radiation (23%) and medical (20%) oncology, and nursing (18%), across six Australian states, with an even spread of experience level. CONCLUSION: This study identified a large number of existing CRC QIs and prioritized the most clinically relevant QIs for use by Australian MDTs to measure and monitor their performance. Copyright 2023 The Authors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. |
URI: | https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9574 |
DOI: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13917 |
Journal: | Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology |
Type: | Journal Article |
Study or Trial: | Systematic Review |
Department: | Radiation Oncology Network Surgery |
Facility: | Westmead |
Keywords: | Oncology |
Appears in Collections: | Westmead Hospital 2019 - 2024 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.