WSLHD
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9617
TitleThe effect of sugammadex on patient morbidity and quality of recovery after general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Olesnicky, B. L.;Farrell, Clare;Clare, P.;Wen, Shelly;Leslie, K.;Delaney, A.
WSLHD Author: Farrell, Clare;Wen, Shelly
Subjects: Sugammadex;Delayed Emergence from Anesthesia;Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents;Neuromuscular Blockade;Neostigmine;Cholinesterase Inhibitors;Postoperative Complications;Anesthesia, General
Issue Date: 2024
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Residual neuromuscular block is associated with increased patient morbidity. Therefore prevention of residual neuromuscular block is an important component of general anaesthesia where neuromuscular blocking agents are used. Whereas sugammadex improves reversal based on neuromuscular twitch monitoring parameters, there have been no prospective, adequately powered definitive studies demonstrating that sugammadex is also associated with less patient morbidity. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomised trials comparing sugammadex with anticholinesterase-based reversal or placebo reversal that reported important patient outcomes beyond the postanaesthesia care unit. RESULTS: We identified 43 articles, including 5839 trial participants. Only one trial reported days alive and out of hospital to 30 days (DAOH-30), which showed that the number of DAOH-30 was similar in those allocated to sugammadex compared with neostigmine-based reversal (25 days [19-27] vs 24 days [21-27], median difference 0.00 [-2.15 to 2.15]). Pooled analyses of data from 16 trials showed an estimated odds ratio (OR) for postoperative pulmonary complications of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.95) with sugammadex use. Pooled analysis showed that pneumonia (eight trials OR 0.51 [0.24-1.01] with sugammadex use), hospital length of stay (23 trials, mean difference -0.31 [-0.84 to 0.22] with sugammadex use), and patient-reported quality of recovery (11 trials, varied depending on metric used) are similar in those allocated to sugammadex vs control. The difference seen in mortality (11 trials, OR 0.39 [0.15-1.01] with sugammadex use) would be considered to be clinically significant and warrants further investigation, however, the rarity of these events precludes drawing definitive conclusions. CONCLUSION: Although few trials reported on DAOH-30 or important patient outcomes, sugammadex is associated with a reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications, however, this might not translate to a difference in hospital length of stay, patient-reported quality of recovery, or mortality.
URI: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9617
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.032
Journal: British Journal of Anaesthesia
Type: Journal Article
Study or Trial: Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Review
Department: British Journal of Anaesthesia 132(1):107-115, 2024
Facility: Westmead
Appears in Collections:Westmead Hospital 2019 - 2024

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.