Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9653
TitleLong-term safety and efficacy of transcatheter microwave and radiofrequency denervation in a chronic ovine model
Authors: Balaji, Poornima;Barry, Michael A.;Tran, Vu T.;Marschner, Simone L.;Lu, Juntang;Nguyen Minh, Duc;Mina, Ashraf;Bandodkar, S.;Alvarez, S.;James, Virginia;Ronquillo, John;Varikatt, Winny;Kovoor, Pramesh;McEwan, Alistair;Thiagalingam, Aravinda;Thomas, Stuart P.;Qian, Pierre C.
WSLHD Author: Balaji, Poornima;Barry, Michael A.;Tran, Vu T.;Marschner, Simone L.;Lu, Juntang;Nguyen Minh, Duc;Mina, Ashraf;James, Virginia;Ronquillo, John;Varikatt, Winny;Kovoor, Pramesh;McEwan, Alistair;Thiagalingam, Aravinda;Thomas, Stuart P.;Qian, Pierre C.
Subjects: Cardiology;Nephrology
Issue Date: 2024
Citation: Journal of the American Heart Association. 13(9):e031795, 2024 Apr 25
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) has had inconsistent efficacy and concerns for durability of denervation. We aimed to investigate long-term safety and efficacy of transcatheter microwave RDN in vivo in normotensive sheep in comparison to conventional radiofrequency ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sheep underwent bilateral RDN, receiving 1 to 2 microwave ablations (maximum power of 80-120 W for 240 s-480 s) and 12 to 16 radiofrequency ablations (180 s-240 s) in the main renal artery in a paired fashion, alternating the side of treatment, euthanized at 2 weeks (acute N=15) or 5.5 months (chronic N=15), and compared with undenervated controls (N=4). Microwave RDN produced substantial circumferential perivascular injury compared with radiofrequency at both 2 weeks [area 239.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 152.0-343.4) mm2 versus 50.1 (IQR, 32.0-74.6) mm2, P <0.001; depth 16.4 (IQR, 13.9-18.9) mm versus 7.5 (IQR, 6.0-8.9) mm P <0.001] and 5.5 months [area 20.0 (IQR, 3.4-31.8) mm2 versus 5.0 (IQR, 1.4-7.3) mm2, P=0.025; depth 5.9 (IQR, 1.9-8.8) mm versus 3.1 (IQR, 1.2-4.1) mm, P=0.005] using mixed models. Renal denervation resulted in significant long-term reductions in viability of renal sympathetic nerves [58.9% reduction with microwave (P=0.01) and 45% reduction with radiofrequency (P=0.017)] and median cortical norepinephrine levels [71% reduction with microwave (P <0.001) and 72.9% reduction with radiofrequency (P <0.001)] at 5.5 months compared with undenervated controls. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter microwave RDN produces deep circumferential perivascular ablations without significant arterial injury to provide effective and durable RDN at 5.5 months compared with radiofrequency RDN.
URI: https://wslhd.intersearch.com.au/wslhdjspui/handle/1/9653
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.031795
Journal: Journal of the American Heart Association
Type: Journal Article
Study or Trial: Controlled Study
Department: Cardiology
Pathology
Histology
Facility: Auburn
Blacktown
Westmead
Mount Druitt
Affiliated Organisations: Cardiology Department, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
NSW Health Pathology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
The Westmead Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
Keywords: kidney denervation
mass spectrometry
microtomy
microwave thermotherapy
radiofrequency ablation
renal artery
thermal ablation
buprenorphine
heparin
noradrenalin
Appears in Collections:WSLHD publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing